I'm so serious about the movie A Serious Man that I'm actually trying to gain a better
understanding of quantum mechanics. I'm
certain I've never written anything remotely close to this subject in my entire
life. In fact, my whole history with
science isn't too good.
Going back to Middle School, I nearly failed my science
project. I ended up passing with the
help of Mrs. Domowitz, but testing the sugar in soft drinks was hardly
something interesting. I had my booth at
the science fair just like everyone else, but had less frequent visitors than
the "smaht" kids. Things
didn't get much better in high school.
Though many of the simple dissections were fine along my scientific
path, the big one, the fetal pig dissection went horribly wrong, mostly because
my partner went Orenthal on the thing … mostly.
I believe we ended up with a D+. Biology
was one of two subjects in my life I came close to receiving a "D"
in. Naturally, most kids went on to Chemistry
from there, whereas I resorted to "Environmental Science" with the
rest of the Gumps. After Chemistry, the
really smart ones went on to Physics.
Obviously, I never took that step.
Now mathematics on the other hand I've been pretty good
at. I wasn't getting invites to the Top Gun
camp of mathematics by Evan Drake or anything, but I held my own. I often joke that my high school was harder
than my college (which is probably true so not really a joke), but in my last
year of high school, the majority of us took Pre-Calculus. I knew I'd have to take at least one class in
mathematics to satisfy an elective in college, so I figured I should take
Calculus and signed up for it first semester freshman year, despite the fact
that Thee University of Tampa only required Basic Algebra, which I had
basically completed my freshman year of high school.
Calculus is the second class I almost received less than a
"C" in. In fact, I nearly and
probably should've failed. During my
first semester of freshman year, everyone I had met (read: People that lived on
my floor in the dorm) all had lunch at 11, which was the time of my Cal class. At noon, there was nobody to eat with, so I
basically ended up cutting class more than I should have. This isn't smart in math classes. Before the final, knowing I was close to
failing, I decided I'd have to teach myself Calculus with the help of the large
text book.
The results were mixed, because on the final, I only got 1
out of 5 answers correct, which is kind of the point in math classes. If 2+2 doesn't equal 4, you're wrong, it's
quite simple. However, I did show gained
knowledge as I showed the work on all 5 problems correctly, and my numbers were
only off due to the fact that I made some careless mistakes. Not sure why, but this was good enough for
the teacher to give me a "C" for the semester.
This back story in science and math was necessary though to
get into the discussion of Schrodinger's Cat, and the film A Serious Man. I loved the movie even before I had a
clue what Schrodinger's Cat was. I was
like the Asian kid in the film saying, "I understand the physics, I
understand the dead cat" without fully grasping the full theory. After watching it, I started reading some
reviews and saw it was based on this theory, with the perfect foreshadowing for
the protagonist being that he's teaching the theory in class as his world
collapses on him.
Now, if you take the Cat theory in its simplest form, you
can find many parallels in the film from the beginning such as the dybbuk (whom
we really don't know if he's dead or alive because we never see him die) to the
very end with the tornado sequence which though it looks like pending doom, may
not be if they can get that door open and hide.
I found many examples throughout the film as well, but then again, I'm
merely taking the "dead cat" part of the theory. Schrodinger's Cat tries to debunk the Copenhagen interpretation
of quantum mechanics (yes, I am reading wikipedia as I type this) by stating
the cat is alive AND dead, whereas Shrodinger, like the Physics professor
explaining to the Korean student, it has to be one or the other, it can't be
both. These paradoxes are what make the
movie.
My point is, I loved this film so much that I tried to learn
a physics theory to get a better appreciation of the movie. That's what good films do. Though I don't have a full grasp on the dead
cat, the smallest amount of understanding gave me much more insight to this
film, rather than it just being a stereotypical story of a Jewish guy worried
about his money.
No comments:
Post a Comment